You are sitting in front of an X-window terminal. You can move from one of the three windows to the others moving the cursor with the mouse and clicking on the left button. UNIX commands can be issued from these windows (but do not lose time playing around!).
in Table 1.
After having typed @@ dodel, you will be asked to give a name of a frame, which will then appear on the screen. Try to identify possible morphological properties of the galaxy. Can you see a disk? Can you see spiral arms? Is there a bar?
Following the instructions, measure first the value of the sky (in
counts per pixel) with the cursor in several positions around the
galaxy and type the average in. Is the sky background flat? For one
frame, quantify the percentage variations of its value across the
image and compare this value with the expected shot noise (see
Eq. 2 with
). Then measure the position of
the center of the galaxy, and finally, delete all of the (foreground)
stars or unwanted objects around the galaxy with cursor. The frame
will appear on the screen with black spots where deletions were
made. Check that all of the unwanted objects have been deleted. If
some are still present, delete them with the command @@
domoredel. Now you are ready to run @@ docog. The scale of the
telescope+CCD detector system
is 0.396 arcsec/pixel. Now you
have created a file with extension .cog (for example, 691016222.cog).
of the distance from the center with the
command plquat file or plexp file, where file is,
for example, 691016222. You can obtain hardcopies of the plots by
typing device postland, executing the plotting programs
once more and giving again device x11.
Classify the galaxy as elliptical, spiral or S0 with the help of these
plots, of the morphological information you collected in the previous
step, and by comparing the central surface brightnesses. Use the
brightness of the sky in the R band (20.63 mag/arcsec
) to get the
calibration (see Eq. 13). Determine its flattening (if it is an
elliptical) or its inclination angle, from the ellipticity you measured above.
Get a first estimate of
or
h drawing a line on these plots (see Eq. 14 and
15).
, the
half-luminosity radii
and the average surface brightnesses
of the galaxies, knowing the sky in the R band (see
Eq. 13 and point (4) above). Use both methods described in
Section 2.4.
Compare the values of
determined here with those obtained
above. For one galaxy determine what would be the change in
if your determination of the sky would have been wrong by
% (you
do not need to derive again the curve of growth).
into Kpc. If D is the distance of the object
in Mpc (240 for A2593, see Sect. 1), one has:
where the numerical factor converts arcsec into radiants. Convert
into absolute values
using Eq. 6. Convert
into solar luminosities, remembering that the R band solar luminosity
is
. You do not need to convert
into erg/s:
Eq. 8 gives the ``number of suns'' present in the galaxy.
against
and
against
. Draw the ``best-fit'' lines to these points and determine
the coeffecients a and b of Eq. 22 and c and d
for Eq. 23. Estimate
the standard deviation (rms) around these relations. How this translate
on the precision of the estimate of the distance of the cluster (see Eq.
24)? How can Eq. 23 be used to estimate distance ratios?
in Table 1, repeating what described above.
The sky in the B band is 22.17 mag/arcsec
.
Compute the total magnitude in the B band
using the fact that the
total magnitude of the sun in the B band is 5.48. Finally, compute the
total colour
. Discuss the results having in mind the classification
of these objects.
%. To do this, open a MIDAS session and give
the MIDAS command write/descr file himmel/r/1/1 value. Running
again @@ docog). Quit the MIDAS session and enter in
SUPERMONGO. Plot the resulting profile with plquat file.
Discuss the results in view of galaxy classification.
Answer the following questions when writing your report:
using Eq. 15 and 16.
and
.
.
in arcsec and Kpc,
,
,
,
for the 9 galaxies analyzed, as determined from
the analysis of the R frames. Quote the percentage
error on
that you get by comparing the different methods of
points (4) and (5). Quote the variations of
expected from point (5).
If you have time and will, answer these questions too:
using Eq. 14 and 16
(the computation is somewhat tedious).